FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

The following summaries are based on the individual questions submitted to the project team during engagement sessions and via email, and categorized according to their main topics.

Some submitted questions have overlapping or secondary topics – to ensure no duplication, we have categorized questions only under the main topic but we have answered any subtopics questions in the other/related summary questions. Please take the time to read the answers and additional information available on the website.

As we gather more information, we will update the questions/answers here, so please check back as needed.

This FAQ was last updated in March 2025.

Environmental Factors

Summary Question

How will the proposed Facility’s water usage and water treatment affect residents, the environment, and the North Thompson River, particularly including the impact on local water supplies (drought concerns) and discharge of effluent (potential river and Kamloops Lake pollution)

 
Summary Response

Initial conversations between SEDC and the Ministry of Water, Lands and Resource Stewardship, there is a significant volume of water feeding the location of the proposed water intake (North Thompson River).

It is expected the Facility would use ~1000 m3/day (summer) and ~1400 m3/day (winter) for one phase during normal operations. This amount is less than 0.1% of the water flow available in the North Thompson River, depending on the time of year (0.01%-0.139%).

As the lowest flow levels in the North Thompson River are in February, and as less water is needed in the summer months, the water requirements of the Facility will not negatively affect seasonal/summer water restrictions.

With the available volume of water being sufficient to meet the Facility needs, there is no concern of the Facility’s water requirements negatively affecting local drought conditions.

There are two wastewater streams with approximate volumes listed below. We are currently awaiting test results to determine whether either of the below suggested options are acceptable:

  1. Processing the feedstocks (460m3/day or 32% of intake water).
    Testing is ongoing, with the current proposal being to send this wastewater stream to City of Kamloops wastewater treatment facility.
  2. Back flushing filters for incoming river water (100m3/day or 7% of intake water).
      1. There are two options being evaluated for the unprocessed water used to flush the filters in the river water intake, being:
        should the water meet river water quality standards, then returning it to the river (as this water does not touch any part of the process); or
      2. send it to be processed at the City’s wastewater treatment facility.
        In the event that neither of the above options are considered viable, then we will continue with further feasibility studies.

The backflushed filter water contains high concentrations of minerals and sediments where it would not be feasible to reuse in the process. Because the firewater tank is also the source of water to be filtered, by sending the backflushed water back to the firewater tank would only increase concentrations over time, requiring ever increasing quantities of water to backflush the filters more frequently.

The proposed Facility design maintains the current buffer of the Riverside Lands and CN Railyard as between the Facility and the North Thompson River. In addition to this buffer zone, there will be an added containment vault at the Facility, to be used to direct any potential spills away from the river.

An emergency response plan with clearly outlined procedures will be developed according to local regulations (TteS and City of Kamloops where applicable) and available on site during the construction, operations, and decommission of site.

Related Slido Questions

  • Isn’t there a lot of water needed for a plant? How will our drought affect this-as we’re already on water restrictions throughout the summer months?
  • What is the proposed water usage & what will be the downstream effects? With record lows and increased water prohibitions, will there be an effect to residents?
  • Will water be drawn from the North Thompson River? How have drought concerns been addressed if so?
  • Has an internal water treatment facility been considered prior to discharging out of the proposed plant?
  • How is waste water from facility going to impact the current City of Kamloops waste water treatment plant?
  • Is the used/discharged water able to be reused for growth instead of being put back in the river?
  • All residents are required to follow water regulations, how is the plant getting around this? It’s consumption is huge in comparison to residents.
  • Are there any plans in place for other water collection and use besides only using the river?
  • How many more chemical by-products will be dumped into the river and an already polluted Kamloops Lake?
  • SAF production may require substantial water resources, which could strain local supplies
  • What are the water requirements associated with the process and does the process require usage of potable water?
  • Where will the 3,400 cubic meters of water needed to run the facility come from?
  • Will effluent be discharged into the North Thompson River?
  • What impact will there be to the already massively polluted Kamloops Lake?
  • Will the river bank be impacted?
  • Will this affect the water?
Summary Question

Considering the unique weather conditions in the Kamloops valley, how will the proposed Facility address air quality concerns related to emissions and the potential effects on surrounding communities? Additionally, what research has been done on the short and long-term health effects of any emissions to residents, particularly children?


Summary Response

Air emissions are considered an off-reserve activity and therefore are subject to provincial statutes and regulations. In British Columbia, provincial air quality standards are often more stringent than federal requirements intended to protect the environment and human health.

The air quality assessment is complete, along with a human health assessment to better understand any potential impacts to human health from air and noise effects.

Facility emissions have been modelled according to the unique Kamloops weather and the specific topography at and around the 7Mile location, taking into considering baseline air quality conditions in Kamloops.

The Facility design targets avoiding or reducing emissions, incorporating measures such as:

  • low NOx or Ultra low NOx burners in the HMU Furnaces;
  • vapor control system to capture/control emissions from process equipment and storage tanks; and
  • sulphur removal process to remove sulphur compounds emissions/apply odour control systems to address any potential sources of odour from operations.

This aligns with the Facility’s intent to create renewable fuels while lowering overall carbon emissions.

If the proposed Facility reaches a positive final investment decision, then as required by the Environment Management Act, the facility will obtain a waste discharge permit administered by the BC ENV. Further assessment of effects on air quality as a result of the Facility will be completed as part of the waste discharge permit application. Based on this assessment and application, a monitoring and reporting program for the Facility emissions may be stipulated as a condition of operations in the permit. A summary of the air quality assessment results will be available on the 7 Mile RF website.

Related Slido Questions

  • Do air emission regulations conform to the daily vent index to keep emissions from accumulating in the valley bottom, as we see from the mill?
  • Will the odour stay in the valley on cloudy days-similar to the inversion in Brock with the pulp mill?
  • We have a unique airshed in the valley north of the Halston =days of fog. Has anyone inquired with local specialists at TRU who are familiar with this scenario?
  • We have valleys and weather inversions which traps air, so the wind only blows north-south for Westsyde and this guarantees us bad air. Why put it in a valley?
  • Why isn’t the plant being build outside the city with airflow directed away from Kamloops instead of adding pollution to the valley?
  • How will the facility address health concerns from added air pollution, given Kamloops already suffers from wildfire smoke every year, and a pulp mill?
  • How will air quality be maintained? Can you demonstrate how air quality is not directly related to any odour detected by nearby communities?
  • I’ve read of air pollution (smell of french fries). How will this impact the local community both on and off the reserve? Unpleasant for those smelling it.
  • Air and noise pollutants must be proven safe and minimal. Would the proponents of this project put it in their backyard? This could be very unhealthy
  • Have there been studies done to test the air pollution and how that will impact surrounding communities (such as schools in Westsyde/Rayleigh)?
  • Hazardous air pollutants released from biofuel plants include: hexane, acetaldehyde, acrolein, formaldehyde. How are you going to prevent this with your plant?
  • How will air pollution be dealt with on foggy socked in days that Kamloops regularly experiences?
  • What air quality impacts will this industrial facility have on residents across the river, specifically in Westsyde? Will this impact our current clean air?
  • Obviously our 2 biggest concerns, with living directly across from the proposed site, are emissions and smell. Also effect on property values.
  • Provide data on all chemical emissions generated by other plants. Specifically air & water emissions, concentrations & known or suspected env &/ health effects.
  • Will modelling be done to determine the impact zone of emissions based on air currents?
Summary Question

How will odour from the plant be managed, especially on cloudy or inversion-prone days?

What will be the recourse residents have if odour issues arise, and who will enforce it?


Summary Response

While historically, Kamloops has dealt with issues relating to industrial smells, this proposed Facility does not anticipate contributing to local odours. Although there are exhaust stacks and vent lines, none of these are sources of odor.

Although no odours are anticipated, following concerns raised by residents regarding odour, further proactive mitigations have been put in place to further address the potential.

The only source at 7Mile RF with the potential for odour are emissions from the feedstock storage tanks. To capture any potential odours, activated carbon filters or similar will be proactively installed on the vent lines of the feedstock tanks.

Should there be any concerns regarding odour, complaints would trigger a thorough review of the system to ensure that mitigations are capturing all potential odours.

Related Slido Questions

  • A complaint based system to mitigate odour? Who enforces this and how is odour measured at an appropriate or safe level?
  • A complaints based system for odour? Really? To late, to little, forget it!
  • Complaints based response system is not great at all. The communities in the nearby valleys need complete reassurance BEFORE this project goes ahead.
  • High River is in a long standing legal battle with Rimrock for their Biofuel plant. The smell is absolutely awful many complaints get tracked, zero has changed!
  • In their words, ‘hoping to use a complaints-based system’ once it is built to mitigate odour. Stinks!
  • Our community has suffered a terrible reputation of SMELLY since the 1960s due to the pulp mill. Is this potential terrible odour a real risk?
  • Pretty disappointed that complaint based smell mitigation wasn’t discussed in depth. How many complaints are required before something is done?
  • Processing of animal tallows will create terrible odours – how will this be mitigated?
  • Sulphur smell?
  • Will this plant ONLY be processing soybean & canola oils, or will there be other materials being processed on site? Significant concern about odour.
  • What are the odour mitigation strategies?
  • What, if any recourse do we have if the complaints over smell continue?
  • Will the odour stay in the valley on cloudy days-similar to the inversion in Brock with the pulp mill?
Summary Question 

What are the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Facility, and what measures are in place to mitigate these risks, both during operation and in the event the plant is not running? 


Summary Response 

Many potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Facility are addressed in detail in other sections, particularly those related to water, air quality, noise and light pollution, social impacts, and resource use. 

Additional potential impacts include those on land and soil, wildlife and habitat, and cultural heritage. 

To better understand current conditions and potential impacts, several studies are underway: 

  • Archaeology Impact Assessment (underway)  
    This study is being conducted in accordance with the Kamloops Indian Band Heritage Conservation Bylaw (1997). Once completed, we will work with Tḱemlúps te Secwépemc archaeology department to determine appropriate measures for site protection and preservation, if required. 
  • Environmental Site Assessments (ESA Phase I complete; ESA Phase II underway)  
    Phase I identified two areas of potential environmental concern, both related to existing rail operations. A Phase II ESA, involving further testing, is underway to assess these concerns in more detail. 
  • Geotechnical (complete) 
    These assessments evaluate soil, rock, groundwater conditions and land stability. When the project progresses into detailed design, key considerations such as soil stability, stormwater management, groundwater protection, etc. will be looked at.  
  • Plant, Animal, Aquatics Study (complete) 
    The plant, wildlife, and aquatic study evaluated vegetation, amphibians, and habitats to identify environmental concerns, including species at risk. The survey resulted in four key recommendations: 
      • Multiple instances of oil and hydrocarbon contamination from the adjacent rail yard have been observed. To mitigate environmental risks and protect local ecosystems, soil and groundwater testing is recommended. 
          • A Phase II Environment Site Assessment, involving further testing, is underway to assess these concerns in more detail. 
      • A man-made wetland, formed by a leaking livestock waterer, was identified. A feasibility study and restoration plan are needed to return the site to its original state. 
          • Further analysis is needed before repairing the leaking livestock waterer. In the spring, a hydrological assessment (measuring water levels) and additional vegetation and wildlife surveys will be taking place.   
      • Develop a conservation plan to protect the localized rubber boa population and enhance bird habitats through thoughtful design, habitat preservation, and other conservation measures. 
          • If the project is approved and detailed design begins, a conservation plan will be initiated.
      • Additional Related Information: 
        • The facility itself will have no flare stack. A ground flare will be used instead and will only be utilized a few times a year for emergency testing.  
        • The Facility proposes to use innovative lighting solutions that direct light downward within the project perimeter to minimize visual impacts.  
        • There will be no burning of railway ties.
        • Changes in the abundance of vegetation communities and species of interest will occur in the Facility footprint (38.9 ha) during construction through loss or alteration from clearing and grubbing activities. The reduction in abundance of traditional use plants and other plant communities and species of interest will be reduced by limiting vegetation clearing to the Facility footprint and through reseeding with native plants in temporary disturbances, where feasible, as well as working with local institutions, committees or conservation groups to preserve species of concern, where possible. Potential effects of species of conservation concern will be mitigated by completing supplemental pre-construction vegetation surveys for rare bryophytes and lichens within the Facility footprint. 
        • During operation, disturbance on piping and tank farm facilities will be limited to occasional vegetation management (brushing) within the Facility footprint and possible spread of weed species. Ongoing management and monitoring of weed species will follow mitigation measures in the Environment Management Plan, as required. 
        • Because of the presence of human disturbances and weed species within the Facility footprint, the magnitude of the residual effects is expected to be low. Effects are predicted to be irreversible and long-term as continued industrial land use post-decommissioning is anticipated and thus vegetation communities and species are not restored 
        • Areas to be cleared of vegetation will be reduced to the extent feasible and will be clearly marked to avoid clearing more than required. 
        • Trees/wood will be cut and repurposed if possible or disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. 
        • Topsoil piles will be monitored for weed growth during construction and corrective measures implemented to manage potential infestation as required. 
        • Work with Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc, local institutions, committees, or conservation groups where possible to preserve plant species and ecological communities of interest, such as allowing seed harvesting and donating live transplants prior to clearing and grubbing. 
        • A Qualified Environmental Professional will be onsite during construction to oversee implementation of detailed mitigation measures outlined in relevant environmental plans. 
  1.  

Related Slido Questions 

  • With regards to local environmental impact, What measures are in place to mitigate air, water, and soil pollution during production? 
  • List of possible impacts 
  • If the market is not there for this fuel, what would happen with the plant if it’s not running. It could become an eyesore. Will there be a plan for recovery? 
  • Will there be light pollution?  
  • Will it have smoke stacks like the domtar site and ifso how high 
  • Will they be burning creosote railway ties?  
  • What will the long term environmental impact be on the land? 

Social & Community Impacts

Summary Question 

How is the project team engaging with neighboring communities to transparently address concerns about the potential impact on the valley, and to inform residents about study results?  

Does the wider Kamloops community have the opportunity to inform the decision-making process and advocate for alternatives (different location, industry, etc.)? 


Summary Response 

Since 2021, the project team (Azure, SEDC, TteS) has worked closely with Ttes Chief and Council and TteS community members to develop the project plan, address questions and apply feedback. 

The draft 7Mile Master Plan (2024) is an update of the previous 7Mile Master Plan (2018) and is informed by planning processes undertaken in the 2005 Land Use Plan. In 2005, the highest and best use for the 7Mile lands in discussion was identified as Industrial Use. 

The 2018 7Mile Masterplan identified the best mix of use as a combination of industrial, rail and commercial, which has been further explored and refined within the updated draft 7Mile Master Plan (2024). The 7Mile Renewable Fuels facility plan is in alignment with decades of planning. Given that the project is on TteS reserve land, the engagement path focuses on TteS leadership and membership. The following neighbouring First Nations communities have been informed of the project:  

  • Adams Lake Indian Band 
  • Bonaparte Indian Band 
  • High Bar First Nation 
  • Neskonlith Indian Band 
  • Noiatch 
  • Shuswap Band 
  • Simpcw First Nation 
  • Skeetchestn First Nation 
  • Skwlax te Secwepemculecw 
  • Splatsin 
  • Whispering Pines/ Clinton 
  • Ashcroft Indian Band 
  • Boothroyd 
  • Boston Bar First Nation 
  • Coldwater Indian Band 
  • Cook’s Ferry 
  • Kanaka Bar 
  • Lower Nicola Indian Band 
  • Lower Similkameen 
  • Lytton First Nation 
  • Métis Nation of British Columbia 
  • Nicomen 
  • Okanagan First Nation 
  • Oregon Jack Creek 
  • Osoyoos First Nation 
  • Penticton Indian Band 
  • Shackan First Nation 
  • Siska 
  • Skuppah 
  • Spuzzum 
  • Upper Nicola Indian Band 
  • Upper Similkameen 
  • Westbank First Nation 

While engagement with neighbouring communities is not a requirement, as a good neighbour, we are committed to keeping the wider Kamloops and area community informed by providing updates via our website and e-newsletter, as well as holding occasional open information sharing events.  It is important to us that you have the correct information, so we are committed to being available to address your questions. We encourage you to email us directly at [email protected].  

As more detailed information is received and the project is refined, we will continue to follow this engagement path, with a focus on keeping our website current and responding to questions or concerns as they arise. 

Related Slido Questions 

  • Are communities across the river being reached out to? The smell will effect the whole valley as it will sit in the valley bottom.  
  • How does the plant plan to execute and inform resident on studies on water and air pollution?  
  • Let’s talk about Plan B. No heavy industrial in Plan B right? Why haven’t we been given an option for the lesser of two evils? Do we get the choose?  
  • Many concerns come from your proposal, I live in Westsyde as many others do too. No one asked me or my neighbours about this as it affects us the most. 
  • On tekemlupsbusiness.ca “TteS & Azure have actively engaged the local community through multiple open houses fostering transparency..”Elaborate. When was this? 
  • Does the community of Kamloops have a voice in this decision? 
  • U R  legally required to hold public forums, but R U legally required to address peoples concerns or is it just part of a process that will be ignored? 
Summary Question 

Is noise and light pollution expected from the facility during construction and when it is operational, and what measures will be taken to mitigate these impacts? Are there applicable noise regulations and how will these be enforced?  


Summary Response 

Noise is not anticipated to contribute to local noise levels. Existing noise levels are anticipated to be higher than any noise produced by 7Mile RF, and therefore any noise produced from the project will be inaudible once it reaches the closest residential areas (e.g. Rayleigh & Westsyde). The noise emissions are expected to be as follows:  

Noise (Operations)
Valued Component Project Emissions Kamloops Baseline BC Regulation Federal Regulation
Day (dBA) 47.1 53 66 55.6
Night (dBA) 46.8 51 56

Per the BC Oil and Gas Commission 2024, these project noise levels (47.1 Day / 46.8 Night) are comparable to sound in a quiet office/living room or moderate rainfall/quiet street, and is lower than Kamloops baseline noise. 

Decibels (dBA) Risk Level Description of Typical Noise Sources
0 Typical noise levels No noise
10 Typical noise levels Breathing
20 Typical noise levels Rustling Leaves
30 Typical noise levels Whispering at 1.5 metres
40 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS QUIET OFFICE OR LIVING ROOM
50 Annoying, irritating noise levels Moderate rainfall or quiet street
60 Annoying, irritating noise levels Conversational speech at 1 metre or noisy office
70 Annoying, irritating noise levels Moderate rainfall or quiet streetCity traffic, noisy restaurant
80 Hazardous-potential hearing loss with prolonged exposure Busy traffic intersection
90 Hazardous-potential hearing loss with prolonged exposure Loud shouting, hairdryer, lawnmower
100 Hazardous-potential hearing loss with prolonged exposure Motorcycle, jet takeoff at 600 metres
110 Hazardous-potentially painful noise levels Amplified rock music
120 Hazardous-potentially painful noise levels Jet takeoff at 60 metres
130 Hazardous-potentially painful noise levels Air raid siren

Ttes Bylaw would address any noise complaints related to the Facility, per TteS Bylaw policy. The 7Mile RF team would then be required by Bylaws to address and mitigate unexpected noise.  

Related Slido Questions 

  • Currently, the noise from the shunting of cars from the CN yard can be heard through the communities nearby. One can only expect this to increase?  
  • How much noise pollution can we expect AFTER construction is complete? 
  • What light and noise will be emitted from this facility and what will the operational hours be where light and noise can be expected? 
  • There are no “noise regulations” in place – you are suggesting a complaints based scenario. How do we know you can actually mitigate the sound? 
  • Westsyde is already affected by noise pollution of the existing rail yard and tracks – With more rail activity, will noise be limited more than it is now?
Summary Question 

What measures are in place to prevent potential disasters, such as explosions or fires, either at the Facility or as processed fuel is transported through Kamloops and area? 


Summary Response 

As part of project planning, all potential risks, including natural disasters, and fires, are documented and ranked. Any risk that can be designed out of the Facility will be removed. For example, the Facility design ensures a significant buffer between the Facility and the North Thompson River, which allows for potential spills to be directed away from the river into a containment vault and creates a further buffer between the Facility and residential areas. 

For risks that cannot be removed, risk management strategies (e.g. procedures, controls, and safety systems) will be put in place to reduce the likelihood of each specific risk occurring and/or consequence if the specific risk would occur.   

The facility will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, codes and industry best practices. Technical Safety BC plays a crucial role in overseeing the safe installation and operation of the pressure equipment and piping systems. WorksafeBC will conduct workplace inspections to assess compliance with Occupational Health & Safety Regulations. TteS, or their designate, will inspect buildings to ensure compliance with building codes and other regulations related to fire detection systems, sprinkler systems, fire exits, building materials, etc.  

Ultimately, the facility operator bears the primary responsibility for ensuring the facility’s safety. The operator, working with local authorities and emergency response services, will develop an emergency response plan. Safety employees will be trained on the plan, and the plan will be available on site during the construction, operations and decommission of the site.  

Transportation of completed goods will be according to all federal/provincial laws governing train transport (e.g. Canada Transportation Act, etc) and following best practices and rail safety standards (e.g. Transport Canada). 

Related Slido Questions 

  • How can you guarantee that the millions of litres of fuel going through North Kam and Brock won’t repeat the Quebec train disaster that blew up the town?   
  • What is the potential for plant fire and explosions? 
Summary Question 

Beyond the land-leasing revenue (to TteS) and the creation of 150 permanent jobs at the Facility, what are the benefits of the proposed plant to the City of Kamloops and area (e.g. wastewater treatment facility upgrades, multi-use pathway, potential contracts with major airlines, etc.)? Additionally, how will the project impact employment opportunities, wages, and training, both during construction and long-term? 


Summary Response 

This proposed Facility will provide economic growth with 1500 jobs during construction over the course of 2-3 years, and 150 permanent long-term jobs at full build out, thus supporting local business growth by providing opportunities for complementary industries to expand operations to meet the increase in demand for local services (e.g. hotels, restaurants, etc.). 

The project team is planning discussions with local educational institutions, to provide specific training to upskill interested TteS community members and residents to meet qualification requirements for specific jobs at the Facility. This training would provide opportunities to increase local workforce skills while concurrently increasing income for individuals.  

The 7Mile Renewable Fuels team is in discussions with potential customers (airlines, etc.) regarding offtake agreements, with the aim to secure contracts before the final investment decision in late 2025.  

In the draft 7Mile Masterplan, TteS (SEDC) is working on incorporating a multi-use path strategy to connect Kootenay Way with Rayleigh.   

If a positive final investment decision is reached, TteS will have an equity share in the business operations and rail facility. This proposed equity share will have a significant impact on community programing, housing, and economic development further enriching the lives of many. 

We anticipate that other benefits related to the project will arise as the project progresses and will add those benefits here.  

Related Slido Questions 

  • Is there a provision or plan in place participate financially in upgrade of city facilities if required due waste water treatment plant? 
  • How does this benefit the city aside from Tk’emlups getting paid from the company to build a plant on there land? 150 jobs is a small gain in comparison.  
  • How does this benefit Tkemlups? Does this company have any contacts with major airlines to insure this is a sustainable project that will last 50 plus years?  
  • Is there opportunity in this project to develop a multi-use pathway along highway 5 connecting Rayleigh to the Halston.  
  • What benefit does the city of Kamloops get from having this plant built? 
  • Will it be 150 permanent jobs-or just during construction?  
  • What are the plans for employment , training, positions ? I have life experience IM with TMEP, fuel hauler , Haul truck, mine and mill work. Employable ? Wages 

Regulatory

Summary Question

Will the Facility be governed by municipal, provincial, and federal regulations, or is it exempt due to its location on reserve land? Will risk assessments be made public, and how will violations and/or pressing issues be enforced and/or addressed?


Summary Response

The location for the proposed Facility is within Kamloops Indian Reserve No. 1 , north of downtown Kamloops, BC. These lands operate under the Reserve Land and Environment Management Program (RLEMP). The RLEMP is a comprehensive land management program the allows First Nations to manage all aspects of land, natural resources and the environment on reserve.

Projects on reserve land may be subject to regulations under the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. However, this project’s scale was deemed insufficient to trigger a formal review by the agency, as such, the TteS Environmental Department is the lead authority on regulation. Given the department’s limited capacity and technical expertise, they are seeking external assistance to oversee the project while ensuring compliance with all applicable federal and provincial regulations.

There may be several triggers for review processes by other federal agencies. For instance, the facility may need approval by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and potentially Environment and Climate Change Canada. As studies are completed, these agencies may initiate their respective review processes. And where applicable, provincial permitting will be required (e.g. Air).

The facility will also be subject to approval from TteS’ Development Approval Board, adhering to all TteS By-laws, policies and agreements, which in instances are mirrored from provincial standards (e.g. BC Building Code, BC Fire Code).

Any concerns or violations will be addressed by TteS Environmental or TteS By-law in accordance with their laws and policies

For more information, visit: Land Development Approvals – Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc

Related Slido Questions

  • What Federal/ Provincial agencies would be responsible for enforcing violations by the plant on Reserve land?
  • Regarding health & environmental concerns. Will pressing concerns/violations have to be directed to federal authorities, or how will these issues be addressed?
  • Why is WHO involved in this? Do we not have our own measurement/gauge/rules here in Kamloops, BC and Canada?
  • will this plant be governed by municipal provincial and federal regulations or are you exempt being located on reserved lands.
  • Will all risks assessments to humans and environment be made public?

Infrastructure & Development

Summary Question 

What is the source of raw materials (% from purpose-grown versus waste) and will non-agricultural feedstocks be used? 

Will the plant produce other biofuels (e.g. biodiesel), what chemicals will be used in the production process(es) and how will the processing be done safely (e.g. waste disposal, cracking process)?  

How will the facility be powered (natural gas consumption) and what will be the storage capacity for combined fuels on-site? 


Summary Response 

Feedstocks will primarily be made up of canola oil, with some used cooking oils and animal tallows used to supplement the primary feedstock. The project is focused on the use of Canadian grown canola seed oil to support Canadian agriculture and boost the Canadian economy. Currently, the majority of Canadian canola is exported out of the country. The proposed 7 Mile RF Facility would utilize 500,000 tons of canola oil in production annually, redirecting this primarily export resource to stay in Canada and support Canadian GDP.  The overall breakdown will vary as the mix of feedstocks will depend on availability, infrastructure, and economic factors. These factors will also contribute to whether other renewable fuels are considered for future production at the Facility, however currently SAF is the primary focus.  

Chemicals will be used to pre-treat feedstocks to ensure the feedstocks do not damage the Facility equipment. These pre-treatment chemicals include a 50% caustic / 50% water solution and a 50% citric acid / 50% water solution. Best-in-class operating procedures and spill containment will be used to ensure that these chemicals will not contaminate soil or water. Small quantities of Dimethyl Disulfide (DMDS) are used in the hydrotreating process – DMDS is recovered as sulfur later in the process, and the business plan is contemplating how to reuse this byproduct in commercial applications (e.g. fertilizer).  

There are no waste fluids from the cracking process.  

The project team is working with utility providers to ensure the Facility’s natural gas and power demands do not impact other utility users.  

Onsite storage capacity for feedstocks and products is sized to ensure the facility has adequate amounts of feedstock and product storage to continue operations should there be any supply chain disruptions. Early design suggests that the tanks will be as follows: 

  • Three feedstock tanks for vegetable oils; 
  • One feedstock tank for used cooking oil, tallow and other biowaste; 
  • Two product tanks for sustainable aviation fuel; 
  • Two product tanks for renewable diesel; 
  • Two product tanks for renewable naphtha; and 
  • Several Intermediate tanks to hold blended feedstocks and pre-treated feedstocks between processing units. 

Related Slido Questions 

  • What chemicals are used in creating this biofuel? Sulphuric and hydrochloric acid? How will this not contaminate the river? (see water) 
  • What is the source of the raw materials? What percentage is expected to be purpose-grown grain and soy vs. waste material such as used vegetable oil? 
  • We don’t want to hear about what you are processing, we want to know HOW you are processing it…this is where the risk to human/environment/ecosystem is. 
  • how and where will the fluids used for the cracking process be disposed of. 
  • how much natural gas will be consumed daily . 
  • How will the renewable fuels production facility be powered?  
  • Please explain the processing of the materials in lay terms, which she accessible to the general public. A handout would be appreciated. 
  • Project description notes agricultural feedstocks, predominantly vegetable oils, will be used to produce SAF. Are these exclusively waste by-products?  
  • what capacity will tanks be for on-site storage of combined fuels. 
  • What chemicals do they use in the processing?  
  • Will other non-agricultural feedstocks be used such as organic (food) waste, biosolids, or forestry by-products? 
  • Will the facility produce other bio fuels such as  bio diesel? 
Summary Question 

Why was this location selected for the proposed Facility, and was there a different location considered?  

How will the proposed Facility impact local infrastructure (e.g. Hwy 5) and nearby communities, and what measures will be taken to mitigate visual impacts? 


Summary Response 

Located on Kamloops Indian Reserve No. 1, When Azure and TteS began discussing the proposed project in 2021, the proposed Facility site was the ~200 acres located between the CN Railyard and the North Thompson River (beginning at about CN Road, known as the “Riverside Lands” or “Hops Farm”). After further project refinement, in 2023 the proposed Facility location was moved to the top of the bench between the CN rail line and Hwy 5 (the 7 Mile lands). These are the only locations that have been considered for this project. The current location is not within the 200-year flood plain.   

TteS planning for the 7Mile lands officially began in 2005 (Land Use Plan), when it was determined that the highest and best use for the 7Mile lands is industrial use. This 7Mile planning continued into two iterations of the 7Mile Master Plan (2018, 2024), which included many community engagement sessions. 

For the proposed Facility, the ready access to rail infrastructure in the BC interior, along with the proximity to Kamloops (an already established transportation hub), and convenient distance to the Port of Vancouver for exports presents a uniquely suitable opportunity. These factors would allow for efficient supply chain networks (feedstock in / SAF out) and a skilled local workforce. Further, the location on TteS reserve lands contributes to economic reconciliation efforts. 

Currently, infrastructure services (sewer, water, etc.) largely end along Kootenay Way. The development of the 7Mile lands will extend servicing to the Northern tip, creating potential for further development possibilities within Kamloops Indian Reserve No 1. In initial designs, the access for the proposed Facility may include one additional Highway exit between Rayleigh and Kamloops – through consultation with the Ministry of Transportaion and Infrastructure, impacts to highway traffic will be minimal. The project team is exploring how the proposed TteS Railyard (storage) North of the Facility may help to alleviate stoppages / improve rail traffic flows in the area.  

Visually, much of the Facility will be an extension of the existing CN railyard. From the Western shore of the North Thompson River, there is 1 km buffer of bare land between the North Thompson River and the CN Railyard (earmarked for potential future agri-solar). From Highway 5 (East of the proposed Facility), the existing topography of the lands will require grading to the level of the current rail tracks, which will create a relatively large decrease in the visibility of the Facility from the highway. TteS is working on a multi-use path strategy from Kootenay Way towards Rayleigh in the draft masterplan and is concurrently exploring improvement of visual aesthetics.  

Preliminary artist renderings are available on the project website. Detailed renderings will be available as detailed engineering moves forward over 2025. 

Related Slido Questions 

  • This area was deemed not suitable for residential as it is a flood plain, why is it different for your plant? Does flooding = pollution in the river? 
  • Wouldn’t this be better to set up further from the city? The smells, emissions, and community’s health from breathing all this in. This seems like a bad idea. 
  • A fuel plant on a sliver of land beside a clean river that beside a large community? Why not move it to the many acres in the middle of the reserve? 
  • How will highway 5 be impacted? Will there be an additional intersection installed? 
  • Is the land that will be used a flood plane?  If so what year (100, 200 yr). Given current atmospheric river events we’ve seen in recent years.  
  • So please tell everyone why the original location by Sun Rivers was rejected? 
  • The City subdivision of  Raleigh is not mentioned. How close will the Plant/Refinery encroach to this community. 
  • This is an oil refinery, plain and simple. Why is this a good location for an oil refinery?  
  • Was a location adjacent to kamloops airport considered? If not, why not? 
  • We already have multiple sources of toxic industry in town. Why did you choose to build, adding to the exciting heavy toxic burned within our valley/city?  
  • What is the minimum offset requirement to have an oil refinery from the highway, a rail operation and the North Thompson River? How will this be achieved? 
  • What were the reasons for moving the plant from the original proposed location? 
  • Where exactly will the plant be built and how many hectares. Will the plant be closer to the river or highway. 
  • who’s bright idea is it to locate it NEXT to a river and directly across from residential? why not located it up on the flats out of town by the old race track? 
  • Why can’t this be put near the Halston at the very least as originally mentioned? Have you looked into areas that don’t directly impact our little communities?  
  • How will property value be impacted for residents with views or within proximity affected by odour from the plant? 
  • Do you have picture of what this plant may look like? or a photo of an existing plant similar to what this plant may look like 
  • Has the City of Kamloops and Tk’emlups considered the impact that the plant will have on all residents who will have a view of the plant? 
  • What will it look like viewing from Westsyde and Bachelor.  Will trees fence off buildings? People bought homes for a beautiful view! 
  • What will the plant look like from highway 5? Will there be screening, landscaping or other visual features to make it less industrial along the highway? 
  • Why is the plant being proposed on land so close to local communities? 
  • Why is this plant not being built further out? This is going to be an industrial eyesore that will cause an odour that will impact everyone surrounding it.  
  • Why was the project moved from near Sun Rivers, to across from Westsyde?  
  • Will the plant, it’s operators and stakeholders cover the decline in property values that building a refinery with 24 hr noise and smell will cause? 
  • Why would a refinery be build inside an already established and growing city? 
Summary Question

How are health and safety concerns related to increased rail traffic being addressed, particularly with only limited crossings accessing residential areas north of the proposed Facility?

What is the average daily amount of fuel and processed product expected to be shipped by rail, and how will this affect local communities?


Summary Response

The Facility will use the proposed TteS Railyard to facilitate rail movements on and off the CN line and to store rail cars. Transportation of completed goods will be according to all federal/provincial laws governing train transport (e.g. Canada Transportation Act, etc).

The proposed Railyard is expected to help alleviate rail congestion throughout the BC Interior, and the project team is exploring how the proposed TteS Railyard (storage) North of the Facility may help to alleviate stoppages / improve traffic flows in the area.

Each week, it is expected that a train carrying feedstock and a train carrying empty product cars would enter the facility, and a train carrying renewable fuels and a train carrying empty feedstock cars would leave the facility. There will be no rail traffic related to the Facility at night.

Related Slido Questions

  • With increase in rail traffic, and only 2 level crossings to access the Raleigh subdivision, how will the company mitigate this health and safety issue.
  • Increased rail traffic already causes severe access issues in communities on Hwy 5N of CN junction. Will this not just compound the current problem?
  • what is the average amount of fuels shipped daily by the railroad system
  • average daily amount of processing product coming by rail

Unclassified

Question

Has an EIDA (Economic Impact Development Agreement) been considered as a requirement for the selected general contractor during the construction phase? 


Answer

We are in the preliminary feasibility stages but we will be considering if the project goes forward.  

Question

Is this why the new fire hall is being built out that way?    


Answer

We do not know as is not connected to the project and recommend contacting the City of Kamloops for clarification. 

Question

Westsyde has grown, and there is a need for an evacuation route, due to wildfires. Will you work with city council to ensure this is completed?


Answer

If the City of Kamloops requires an evacuation route related to this project, we will address meeting their requirements in our future development plans.

Have questions or ideas?

If you have any questions about 7Mile District or the proposed 7Mile Renewable Fuels facility, please reach out!

Contact Us
Scroll to Top